Day Trading Reports
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing

Day Trading Reports

Politics

Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

by admin September 9, 2025
September 9, 2025
Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

President Donald Trump is still facing a $83.3 million payment to writer E. Jean Carroll after a federal appeals court rejected his challenge of a defamation verdict against him Monday.

The ruling from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a lower court decision finding that Trump did, in fact, defame Carroll. Trump’s lawyers argued his comments about Carroll were protected by presidential immunity and that the verdict in the case was unjust. The three-judge panel rejected both of those claims.

‘We conclude that Trump has failed to identify any grounds that would warrant reconsidering our prior holding on presidential immunity. We also conclude that the district court did not err in any of the challenged rulings and that the jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable,’ the court opinion read.

‘The record in this case supports the district court’s determination that the ‘the degree of reprehensibility’ of Mr. Trump’s conduct was remarkably high, perhaps unprecedented,’ the court added.

Carroll sued Trump twice after she released a book in 2019, which claimed Trump raped her during a brief encounter with him in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.

Trump vigorously denied the claims, saying he had never met Carroll, that she was not his ‘type’ and that she fabricated the incident to sell books. His vocal and repeated criticisms and denials led to Carroll’s defamation allegations.

Monday’s ruling comes months after the same court rejected Trump’s appeal in another Carroll-related case. In that appeal, Trump challenged evidence that Carroll’s legal team introduced to the jury during the civil lawsuit, including the Access Hollywood tape that surfaced during Trump’s 2016 campaign.

The full panel of judges declined to hear Trump’s argument, however, forcing the president to either accept defeat or appeal to the Supreme Court.

Read the full ruling below (App users click here)

Fox News’ Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Thune lays groundwork for nuclear option in Senate fight over Trump nominees
next post
LAPD ends Kamala Harris security after union backlash over elite officer use: report

Related Posts

Cotton calls on IRS to pull Muslim advocacy...

August 6, 2025

Hegseth, Signal questions dog Waltz as potentially perilous...

May 3, 2025

Trump instructs Pentagon to ensure troops are paid...

October 16, 2025

Schumer’s shutdown scheme explained: Dems double down on...

October 7, 2025

Biden’s former spokesman slams Trump and GOP for...

March 21, 2025

2 lone Republicans vote against Trump’s ‘big, beautiful...

July 4, 2025

Newsom and Harris both position themselves as potential...

October 28, 2025

UN Security Council backs Trump’s Gaza peace plan...

November 18, 2025

Netanyahu will reportedly hold a security meeting at...

February 16, 2025

Grassley, Johnson press DOJ IG to respond on...

April 17, 2025

    [doubleoptin_header]


    [doubleoptin_footer]

    Editors’ Picks

    • 1

      Forum Energy Metals and Global Uranium Announce Exploration Update on Drill Targeting, Northwest Athabasca Project, Saskatchewan

      January 31, 2025
    • 2

      Mega M&A: Rio Tinto-Glencore Merger Sparks Chatter

      January 28, 2025
    • 3

      Excellent 90% recoveries at Cork Tree Well & Board Update

      February 17, 2025
    • 4

      Rare Earths Stocks: 9 Biggest Companies in 2025

      April 8, 2025
    • 5

      Netflix shares soar as company reports surging revenue, tops 300 million subscribers

      January 23, 2025
    • 6

      Financial Agreement signed releasing $2M grant

      January 23, 2025
    • 7

      FDA officially authorizes Zyn nicotine pouches for sale following health review

      January 23, 2025
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    [disclaimer_helper]

    [copyright_helper]